Search This Blog

Sunday, November 2, 2014

What racism is not

One of the things white people as a culture have in common (except for a few openly proud bigots) is the fear of being explicitly called or otherwise associated as being a racist.  This is in fact what gives the Race Card its trump status.  As a white man I realize I can't speak about racism from any sort of personal experience, but conceptually the subject needs to be discussed.  I've seen too many people unnecessarily tiptoe around race discussions out of irrational fear.  So as a public service, I'll get the conversation started.

Before moving on we need to define racism.  Here is my own definition in two parts:

  1. The belief that one race is superior to another.
  2. The belief that any particular individual is any more or less capable because of their race.
Knowing this, here are three examples people typically confuse as being racist which should not qualify.
  1. Mentioning someone's race to describe them.  If you're trying to find out if someone knows a person you're talking about, it's okay to describe them as black, white, asian, or hispanic. I've seen white friends try to avoid bringing up this obviously helpful attribute to the point of it being comical.  As another example, in a recent Yahoo article, author Calvin Hennick makes another common mistake, assuming that a person who mentions a person's race to describe an encounter that scared them is racist.  The woman described a angry traffic encounter with someone she described as "a big black guy".  In this case, the description probably wasn't the most relevant, but unless she described him as a big angry guy and then followed that up with "whisper-cup hands" and softly but intentionally accentuated "...And he was black!" it was probably just the psychology of trust and appearance and not a specific indictment of race.

  2. Connecting a person's race to cuisine.  People of similar cultures often prefer similar fashions, music, and foods oddly enough.  Most of us also know that not everyone of a similar culture will like all of the same things, so this may bring questions.  So if a white person asks a black person if they like chicken, ribs, or watermelon it may just be an honest question (or jab between trusting friends), but even if a person incorrectly makes assumptions about what someone else may prefer to eat or drink based on race, stereotyping is a far cry from racism.

  3. Loosely correlated subjects or coincidences.  Newsweek was recently blasted for this cover about the risks of smuggled bush meat spreading ebola.  However, because of the hypersensitivity around past racist literature drawing parallels to people of African decent and chimpanzees, the mere mention of a disease from Africa and a chimp cover made people go ape shit (that was a joke not racism).  Even if the editors of Newsweek are racist, there's no proof in that pudding.  Another example I have is based on personal experience.  In the above mentioned Yahoo article, the author states he doesn't have to worry about being followed in a store even though his son will.  While I have no doubt this happens, not every instance of being followed in a store has to do with racism.  For example, I would often go to department stores after work with a tie and my ID badge on. This would make people mistake me for a store employee and ask me where the product was located.  Then I'd have to explain I didn't actually work there.  One time I happened to be browsing similar merchandise as an African American woman.  I didn't really think anything about it until she looked at me angrily and said "why are you following me?".
Racism definitely exists and still happens more than I'll ever experience.  I'm grateful for that.  But as Sigmund Freud is incorrectly attributed to have said "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar."

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

The Official Rules on Sweat Pants

Sometimes I wonder what my legacy would be if I died tomorrow.  If my largest contribution would be to present the official rules of sweat pants, I would be fine with that.

No sweatpants allowed in public unless...
  1. It is between the hours of 10 pm and 5 am.
  2. You are working out.
  3. You just finished an outdoor workout and have not stopped home yet.
  4. You just finished an indoor workout and did not shower and change afterward and have not stopped home yet, you sweaty smelly animal.
  5. You are on your way to a workout and cannot wait to conduct your public business until after your workout to change.
  6. You are at a pajama party and you sleep in sweat pants.
  7. You are helping a friend move or volunteering manual labor.
  8. It is the zombie apocalypse.
Now let's define "public".
  1. Anywhere that is outside your house and property.
  2. Anywhere not inside a hotel room or house / yard you are renting.
  3. A friend or family's home where you haven't known every person there for at least one year.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Upworthy is Wrong

While perusing my Facebook feed today, I came across this gem and had to comment:

See the moment Cate Blanchett gave shade to E! for their sexist camera work (via @Upworthy) 
http://www.upworthy.com/oh-snap-cate-blanchett-asks-e-why-they-filmed-her-like-that-but-not-the-men-9?g=2&c=ufb1

Just because women are filmed differently on the red carpet does not make something sexist.  Women are filmed differently for two reasons:
  1. They dress differently.
  2. People (mostly woman in my circles) care what they are wearing.
So you just go on being wrong, Upworthy, and I'll keep correcting you.